AutoPuzzles - The Internet's Museum of Rare Cars!

Puzzles, Games and Name That Car => Solved AutoPuzzles => 2012 => Topic started by: Carnut on November 22, 2012, 08:59:22 AM

Title: Solved - NEH 2248: Frua Glas 1004/1704 Limousine II X3L prototype - 1964
Post by: Carnut on November 22, 2012, 08:59:22 AM
Name this car and from when it dates, for an easy Rookie point:

ANYONE FOUND GIVING ANSWERS GLEANED BY USING GOOGLE SEARCH BY IMAGE MAY BE BANNED FOR AN INDETERMINATE PERIOD!
Title: Re: NEH 2248
Post by: FrontMan on November 23, 2012, 06:39:13 AM
Glas 1400, 1963?
Title: Re: NEH 2248
Post by: Carnut on November 23, 2012, 07:40:48 AM
Quote from: FrontMan on November 23, 2012, 06:39:13 AM
Glas 1400, 1963?

It's a Glas, but that's all that's right.
However, I'll lock it for you for 24 hours since you've got that (they easy bit...) to see if you can come up with the correct model, code-name and year.
Title: Re: NEH 2248
Post by: Carnut on November 24, 2012, 10:06:16 AM
This is open to any Rookie again now.
Title: Re: NEH 2248
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2012, 04:32:12 AM
And now it's open to any Rookie or Expert!
Title: Re: NEH 2248
Post by: thorax on November 30, 2012, 04:48:48 AM
Glas Isaria X2L concept car by Frua (1965)
Title: Re: NEH 2248
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2012, 05:06:07 AM
Quote from: thorax on November 30, 2012, 04:48:48 AM
Glas Isaria X2L concept car by Frua (1965)

That's right; also known as the Glas 1004 or 1704.
I really did think the Rookies would grab this ridiculously easy puzzle!

Here's the unmodified puzzle picture.  I've been trying to find a downloadable rear view but so far without success.  It looks more like a BMW 2002 from the rear!
Title: Re: Solved - NEH 2248: Frua Glas 1004/1704 X2L prototype - 1965
Post by: Carnut on December 05, 2012, 06:45:50 AM
Here's that rear view:

Title: Re: Solved - NEH 2248: Frua Glas 1004/1704 Limousine II X3L prototype - 1964
Post by: Carnut on June 21, 2020, 10:17:03 AM
I've changed the title of this puzzle to what is now known to be correct.
The correct information might not have been available on-line back in 2012...