AutoPuzzles - The Internet's Museum of Rare Cars!
Puzzles, Games and Name That Car => Solved AutoPuzzles => 2013 => Topic started by: Carnut on February 22, 2013, 07:48:27 AM
-
What's this car and who built it, for 1 point?
ANYONE FOUND GIVING ANSWERS OBTAINED BY USING GOOGLE SEARCH BY IMAGE MAY BE BANNED FOR AN INDETERMINATE PERIOD!
-
Experts?
-
I don't know this car: as I see Minilite wheels, or look like ones, I think it's british...is it?
-
USA ? If so, Devin ?
-
I don't know this car: as I see Minilite wheels, or look like ones, I think it's british...is it?
The bits you can't see are British, but not the bits you can...
USA ? If so, Devin ?
...because yes, it's one of these!
See if you can find out the full details!
-
Sorry, it's not locked. It's a Devin from 1957 fitted with a Triumph TR3 engine from 1953 by Bill Hart of Seattle.
(I'm getting uber-competitive of late, stealing from others. This Autopuzzles business is making me a bad person)
-
Sorry, it's not locked. It's a Devin from 1957 fitted with a Triumph TR3 engine from 1953 by Bill Hart of Seattle.
(I'm getting uber-competitive of late, stealing from others. This Autopuzzles business is making me a bad person)
Indeed it is Bill Hart's Devin-Triumph from 1957.
-
Ahem!
The TR2 was made from 1952-55 and the TR3 from 1955-62. So, I expect this had a TR2 engine as there wouldn't have been many secondhand TR3 engines available to a special builder in 1957
-
Whoops ! I copied verbatim the info on the British Racecars website, in my usual haste in case I got beaten to it. Only goes to prove what we all know - don't trust the internet.
(There's a puzzle presently on the Rookies section which I have investigated, and I have found three identical images each of which has a different explanation. So the answer given by the puzzle-setter has a chance of being wrong. Happy days.)
-
I was just investigating that whilst you were posting.
I hadn't actually noticed your reference to the 1953 TR2 engine before - sorry.
I saw the site where you got the information from; they really should know better!
It was the only site I've found so far with a full description of the car, so either they meant it has a TR2 chassis and engine (they also called the chassis a 1953 TR3...) or else it was a later, perhaps crashed, TR3 base.
The only other reference I found to its engine said it was a TR5..
Funny how the passage of time clouds history, and it's also funny how errors keep getting repeated until they become the gospel truth!