AutoPuzzles - The Internet's Museum of Rare Cars!

Puzzles, Games and Name That Car => Solved AutoPuzzles => 2015 => Topic started by: Allemano on April 22, 2013, 04:16:12 AM

Title: Solved: Allemano's № 874 - Porsche ULSAB-AVC
Post by: Allemano on April 22, 2013, 04:16:12 AM
One point for a correct reply!

If you haven't register (http://www.autopuzzles.com/forum/index.php?action=regcenter;sa=register)ed yet, you'll need to do so in order to reply and to post your own puzzles.
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: Allemano on April 29, 2013, 12:23:41 PM
easy expert point!
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: Allemano on May 12, 2013, 08:10:55 AM
easy pro point, then?
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: del78 on May 12, 2013, 08:36:13 AM
some Chrysler?
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: sixtee5cuda on May 12, 2013, 09:53:27 AM
From Europe?
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: Allemano on May 12, 2013, 10:54:29 AM
From Europe.
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: sixtee5cuda on May 12, 2013, 11:56:23 AM
Italian?
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: Allemano on May 12, 2013, 11:58:30 AM
Quote from: sixtee5cuda on May 12, 2013, 11:56:23 AM
Italian?
No.
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: thorax on May 13, 2013, 08:57:29 AM
it's a rendering by ULSAB-AVC (Ultra Light Steel Auto Body-Advanced Vehicle Concepts) made in 2002: for a Mercedes Class C?
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: Allemano on May 13, 2013, 11:45:08 AM
Quote from: thorax on May 13, 2013, 08:57:29 AM
it's a rendering by ULSAB-AVC (Ultra Light Steel Auto Body-Advanced Vehicle Concepts) made in 2002: for a Mercedes Class C?
That's partly correct. ULSAB was the project name, so it's not made by them.
It's not made by or for Mercedes either.

I lock this for you to give it another try. If your next guess is wrong I'll unlock it again.
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: thorax on May 15, 2013, 06:12:55 PM
Porsche Engineering Services, Inc., USA?
Title: Re: Allemano's № 874
Post by: Allemano on May 16, 2013, 12:37:25 PM
Quote from: thorax on May 15, 2013, 06:12:55 PM
Porsche Engineering Services, Inc., USA?
Porsche engineering is correct. I don't know if it was the Porsche US agency, but various parts of this project were apparently done by US engineers.

I have it listed as Porsche ULSAB-AVC, so I declare this puzzle as solved and award another point to your score.
Title: GTC #118 SOLVED: Autosteel & Porsche ULSAB-AVC
Post by: DHoffmann on April 23, 2015, 09:42:02 PM
What vehicle is this, and what company was behind it?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 09, 2015, 05:50:50 AM
Well look what's languishing here... Time for the experts!
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 19, 2015, 10:22:52 PM
Well, up once more!
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: Arunas on May 20, 2015, 08:51:55 AM
Is it Hypercar?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: Majeko on May 20, 2015, 04:23:46 PM
Electric?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 20, 2015, 09:05:15 PM
Quote from: Arunas on May 20, 2015, 08:51:55 AM
Is it Hypercar?

If that's a company name, no this is not. It's also not a hypercar in any other sense of the word.

Quote from: Majeko on May 20, 2015, 04:23:46 PM
Electric?
No, this was not slated for any electric options as far as I'm aware.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: Arunas on May 21, 2015, 12:30:39 AM
Was it ever built in physical form?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 21, 2015, 12:39:19 AM
By an Asian manufacturer?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: del78 on May 21, 2015, 03:47:21 AM
Chrysler?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 21, 2015, 06:59:27 AM
Quote from: Arunas on May 21, 2015, 12:30:39 AM
Was it ever built in physical form?

I don't believe it was, certainly not that I can find.

Quote from: 4popoid on May 21, 2015, 12:39:19 AM
By an Asian manufacturer?

No they were not involved.

Quote from: del78 on May 21, 2015, 03:47:21 AM
Chrysler?

Not by Chrysler, no.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on May 21, 2015, 12:24:20 PM
Designed by an Australasian company ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 21, 2015, 06:31:53 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 21, 2015, 12:24:20 PM
Designed by an Australasian company ?

No it was not.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on May 24, 2015, 07:25:58 AM
Designed in Europe ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 24, 2015, 07:35:26 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 24, 2015, 07:25:58 AM
Designed in Europe ?

I'm not entirely certain on the exterior design. A European company had a hand in this, but whatever's left was not done in Europe.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: Arunas on May 24, 2015, 10:50:12 AM
European company is Karmann?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 24, 2015, 08:30:41 PM
Quote from: Arunas on May 24, 2015, 10:50:12 AM
European company is Karmann?
No it is not.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 24, 2015, 09:00:13 PM
From somewhere in the Western Hemisphere?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 25, 2015, 01:08:27 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 24, 2015, 09:00:13 PM
From somewhere in the Western Hemisphere?

Yes indeed.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 01:22:28 AM
From somewhere in North America?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 25, 2015, 02:27:52 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 01:22:28 AM
From somewhere in North America?
Correct.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 02:47:37 AM
From somewhere in the USA?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 25, 2015, 02:48:05 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 02:47:37 AM
From somewhere in the USA?
Indeed it was.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: Arunas on May 25, 2015, 05:18:35 AM
A university project?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 02:58:37 PM
From California?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 25, 2015, 09:39:25 PM
Quote from: Arunas on May 25, 2015, 05:18:35 AM
A university project?
No this was a proper company's project.

Quote from: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 02:58:37 PM
From California?

No it was not.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 10:54:11 PM
From Michigan?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 25, 2015, 11:15:01 PM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 25, 2015, 10:54:11 PM
From Michigan?
I actually have THREE different states for these guys, but I do believe Michigan is the correct state for this creation.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 26, 2015, 01:20:13 AM
Is this vehicle a project of American Motors Corp. of Southfield MI,which was made up of Nash (Wisconsin), Hudson (Michigan) and Jeep (Ohio).  It looks like it could be related to the ill-fated AMC Pacer.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 26, 2015, 07:28:33 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 26, 2015, 01:20:13 AM
Is this vehicle a project of American Motors Corp. of Southfield MI,which was made up of Nash (Wisconsin), Hudson (Michigan) and Jeep (Ohio).  It looks like it could be related to the ill-fated AMC Pacer.

It's not something from AMC, but you're correct down to the city for the address I have!
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 26, 2015, 02:00:00 PM
Federal-Mogul Corporation is headquartered in Southfield, MI, does this concept have anything to do with them?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: Majeko on May 26, 2015, 04:48:18 PM
Anything to do with Lear Corporation?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 26, 2015, 07:07:31 PM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 26, 2015, 02:00:00 PM
Federal-Mogul Corporation is headquartered in Southfield, MI, does this concept have anything to do with them?

Quote from: Majeko on May 26, 2015, 04:48:18 PM
Anything to do with Lear Corporation?

Neither of these corporations have anything to do with this vehicle as far as I am aware.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 27, 2015, 02:36:52 AM
Was the company behind this vehicle a manufacturer of automobile components rather than a manufacturer of complete automobiles?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 27, 2015, 04:32:32 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 27, 2015, 02:36:52 AM
Was the company behind this vehicle a manufacturer of automobile components rather than a manufacturer of complete automobiles?

Indeed, and not exclusively automotive either.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 27, 2015, 10:18:52 PM
Denso International America is headquartered in Southfield, MI, does this concept have anything to do with them?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 29, 2015, 11:07:01 PM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 27, 2015, 10:18:52 PM
Denso International America is headquartered in Southfield, MI, does this concept have anything to do with them?

No, I do not have them as involved with this at all.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 30, 2015, 04:20:40 AM
Chassix Holdings, Inc. (a combination of Diversified Machine, Inc., and SMW Automotive, LLC.) is headquartered in Southfield, MI, does this concept have anything to do with them?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 30, 2015, 05:18:51 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 30, 2015, 04:20:40 AM
Chassix Holdings, Inc. (a combination of Diversified Machine, Inc., and SMW Automotive, LLC.) is headquartered in Southfield, MI, does this concept have anything to do with them?

Also nope. :)
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on May 30, 2015, 06:03:07 AM
Lear ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 30, 2015, 07:32:23 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 30, 2015, 06:03:07 AM
Lear ?
Nope.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on May 31, 2015, 12:08:07 AM
Anything to do with ESG Automotive, Inc.?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on May 31, 2015, 01:32:48 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on May 31, 2015, 12:08:07 AM
Anything to do with ESG Automotive, Inc.?

Not to my knowledge, nope.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on June 01, 2015, 01:41:19 AM
Just looking at this vehicle I keep thinking that it was produced by a materials manufacturer (steel, aluminum, plastic, etc.) to promote the use of their particular product in automobile manufacture.  My first thought was someone like Alcoa (promoting the use of aluminum), or someone like BASF (promoting the use of plastics), but I can not determine if either of these manufacturers has a significant presence in Southfield, MI.  However I did discover that ThyssenKrupp does have a Southfield presence, so might they be behind this vehicle proposal?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 02:53:43 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on June 01, 2015, 01:41:19 AM
Just looking at this vehicle I keep thinking that it was produced by a materials manufacturer (steel, aluminum, plastic, etc.) to promote the use of their particular product in automobile manufacture.  My first thought was someone like Alcoa (promoting the use of aluminum), or someone like BASF (promoting the use of plastics), but I can not determine if either of these manufacturers has a significant presence in Southfield, MI.  However I did discover that ThyssenKrupp does have a Southfield presence, so might they be behind this vehicle proposal?

Not ThyssenKrupp, but your thinking is spot on.

To hopefully clarify, this was created by a company in several different states, the subdivision that oversaw this project of which based in Southfield (is my understanding, at least). The other associated company behind some portion of the design is European, and very well known.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: 4popoid on June 01, 2015, 03:37:23 AM
Anything to do with IAC (International Automotive Components)?  They are European based, but have a facility in Southfield.  I understand that they have been known for doing automotive interiors, but also do body components such as bumpers.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 05:28:03 AM
Quote from: 4popoid on June 01, 2015, 03:37:23 AM
Anything to do with IAC (International Automotive Components)?  They are European based, but have a facility in Southfield.  I understand that they have been known for doing automotive interiors, but also do body components such as bumpers.

No, the two companies are completely separate, one based in the US the other European, I don't believe they have any overlap whatsoever. Not IAC.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 06:10:28 AM
Is the European company a component supplier as well ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 06:37:33 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 06:10:28 AM
Is the European company a component supplier as well ?

Nope, far more conventional.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 07:25:59 AM
A coachbuilder then... An Italian one ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 07:39:25 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 07:25:59 AM
A coachbuilder then... An Italian one ?

Not coachbuilder, I've found how the Eurpoean company was involved and it's in the "engineering and manufacturing management" for the project. Not Italian either.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 08:08:23 AM
Lotus ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 08:20:42 AM
Nope, not Lotus.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 09:26:02 AM
Is the European company a car make that produces more than 10 000 cars per year ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 09:48:31 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 09:26:02 AM
Is the European company a car make that produces more than 10 000 cars per year ?

Much more, yes.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 09:53:59 AM
German car make ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 10:05:12 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 09:53:59 AM
German car make ?
Quite.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 10:07:17 AM
Ford ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 10:09:30 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 10:07:17 AM
Ford ?
Nein.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 10:34:12 AM
Opel ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 10:34:58 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 10:34:12 AM
Opel ?
Nein.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 10:35:37 AM
VW ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 10:37:45 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 10:35:37 AM
VW ?
Neiner.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 11:10:14 AM
Porsche ?
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 01, 2015, 11:14:41 AM
Quote from: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 11:10:14 AM
Porsche ?

Jawohl! Porsche provided the engineering and manufacturing management behind the car, but everything else comes from our mystery peeps.

I'm leaving this puzzle open because I don't believe the link to Porsche to be quite strong enough to identify the other player.
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: oko94 on June 01, 2015, 12:50:06 PM
ULSAB-AVC program by AutoSteel / Steel Market Development Institute in cooperation with Porsche Engineering Services. It stands for Ultra Light Steel Auto Body Advanced Vehicle Concepts.

The Porsche link was indeed fruitless but 4popoid's idea in his #42 reply was instrumental in finding the solution.

Another great, head-scratching puzzle by DHoffmann, keep it up !
Title: Re: GTC #118
Post by: DHoffmann on June 02, 2015, 02:02:47 AM
Absolutely that's the one!!

Once again a great piece of sleuthing.
Title: Re: GTC #118 SOLVED: Autosteel & Porsche ULSAB-AVC
Post by: Dowdeswell on July 15, 2015, 05:44:24 AM
http://www.autopuzzles.com/forum/index.php?topic=24606.0