Solved -PJ651- Ford Sprint Car for sale by Chaseside in 1954

Started by Paul Jaray, February 20, 2015, 04:56:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nicanary

Is this car a homebuilt called the "XXX Special" or something similar? I still think that's a Peel glassfibre body which someone has fitted to a Ford 1172 s/v base.
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Paul Jaray

It is quite particular.
Not based on a 1172.
Not called Special.
Some interesting features there ;)

richard cuyler

This is a real puzzler - I think it may have Anglia 105E components, judging by the wheels. If this is so, I'll have a better chance of finding out what it is.

Paul Jaray

Quote from: richard cuyler on March 01, 2015, 07:48:54 AM
This is a real puzzler - I think it may have Anglia 105E components, judging by the wheels. If this is so, I'll have a better chance of finding out what it is.
About the engine: bore 2.6 stroke 3.64  ;)

nicanary

#29
My head hurts. I haven't done calculations like that since I left school in 1969. My sums say it's a Zephyr engine.

No it's not - my second working says it's 25.03ci per cylinder. That's 410cc per cylinder.

So it's around 1600cc if it's a 4-cylinder motor, or 2440cc if it's a 6-cylinder, so my Zephyr guess could be right.

NURSE!!!!!
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Paul Jaray

I don't know...I only know bore & stroke  ;D

Wendax

It's rather (2.6/2) * (2.6/2) * 3.64 * Pi = 19,32 Cu.in per cylinder (or 316.7 cc per cylinder). In case it is a four-cylinder engine, we would have 1267 cc displacement, or a little less regarding how many digits you take for Pi.

The displacement would fit a Standard Ten, but that was a long-stroke engine (100 mm = 39.3 in).
Then there is the Hillman Minx engine: 1265 cc, 2.56 × 3.74 in, which would come closer.

nicanary

Quote from: Wendax on March 03, 2015, 07:27:09 AM
It's rather (2.6/2) * (2.6/2) * 3.64 * Pi = 19,32 Cu.in per cylinder (or 316.7 cc per cylinder). In case it is a four-cylinder engine, we would have 1267 cc displacement, or a little less regarding how many digits you take for Pi.

The displacement would fit a Standard Ten, but that was a long-stroke engine (100 mm = 39.3 in).
Then there is the Hillman Minx engine: 1265 cc, 2.56 × 3.74 in, which would come closer.

We had to hand back our slide-rules when we left school.  ;D
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Paul Jaray

#33
I tried all the options (4,6 & 8 ) but couldn' find the matching unit.
I know they already modified a Ford V8 in the 30s.

nicanary

I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Paul Jaray

Not Batten or a race car.

richard cuyler

The 105E engine was a brilliant little thing. Bore 80.96mm (3 3/16"), stroke 48.41mm (1 29/32"). No wonder it could rev so high when modified. If it was much modified, the centre main cast iron bearing cap could fail and those who knew this would fit a steel unit to prevent expensive problems.

Paul Jaray

I don't know if this may help but this car is mid-engined!

nicanary

#38
Quote from: Paul Jaray on March 04, 2015, 07:30:09 AM
I don't know if this may help but this car is mid-engined!

QUE!!!?????

Now that I've calmed down - it's Ford mid-engined and built by a company with connections to Ford who had pre-war modified a Ford V8.

Was the builder a well-known franchised Ford dealer, like the Harrisons?
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Paul Jaray

Quote from: nicanary on March 04, 2015, 07:39:53 AM
Quote from: Paul Jaray on March 04, 2015, 07:30:09 AM
I don't know if this may help but this car is mid-engined!

QUE!!!?????

Now that I've calmed down - it's Ford mid-engined and built by a company with connections to Ford who had pre-war modified a Ford V8.

Was the builder a well-known franchised Ford dealer, like the Harrisons?
so far so good... ;)
(I don't know if it is well known...)

nicanary

I know you probably won't know the answer, but my mind has me thinking strange ideas. It would have been very odd for a garage to think in terms of a mid-engined car at that time (for road use) - I wonder if they got the idea from the WW2 Bren Gun Carrier? Indeed I wonder if some of the components come from one of those.
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Paul Jaray

I am not sure if they actually build the car or just proposed it for sale.
They worked on at least 2 Ford V8s and in both cases they were aerodinamically shaped: streamlined body, vertical fin, covered wheels and rounded fenders (not all those elements in both cars, of course).

Wendax



nicanary

Bristol Street Motors?
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia


D-type

An Allard connection?
Duncan Rollo

The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.

Paul Jaray

Not that I'm aware of.

Paul Jaray

How many Ford dealers were there? It can be solved.

nicanary

Quote from: Paul Jaray on March 23, 2015, 05:56:51 AM
How many Ford dealers were there? It can be solved.

I'll be in my coffin by the time I've gone through them all!  ;D
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia