AutoPuzzles - The Internet's Museum of Rare Cars!

Puzzles, Games and Name That Car => Solved AutoPuzzles => 2017 => Topic started by: barrett on September 18, 2017, 05:55:16 PM

Title: Barrett's #391 - Solved - Leslie Ballamy's 1935 Ellembee Special
Post by: barrett on September 18, 2017, 05:55:16 PM
What's this? Name of car, name of builder, year and engine used for a point
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 02, 2017, 04:48:30 AM
Up
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: richard cuyler on October 02, 2017, 09:52:51 AM
Very nice proportions - is it British and based on a mid-30s Morris 10-4?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 02, 2017, 10:01:46 AM
British, but not Morris 10/4 based
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: richard cuyler on October 02, 2017, 10:04:40 AM
Austin-based?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: FrontMan on October 02, 2017, 03:25:45 PM
Vale Special?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 03, 2017, 04:23:58 AM
I don't believe it is Austin-based, and it's not a Vale
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Allan L on October 03, 2017, 08:54:46 AM
I thought there was a touch of Vale about it, but it's too short in the wheelbase. Perhaps, like the Vale, it has Triumph parts.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Fёdor on October 03, 2017, 11:46:12 AM
Barrington
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 03, 2017, 12:30:26 PM
not Triumph or Barrington
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on October 03, 2017, 12:43:34 PM
Standard-based?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Fёdor on October 05, 2017, 02:59:25 PM

Cambridge 1934
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 05, 2017, 04:04:39 PM
No and No
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 25, 2017, 03:30:37 PM
Up again
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: richard cuyler on October 26, 2017, 06:38:07 AM
Is it made by a well known manufacturer or is it a home-built one-off?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 26, 2017, 06:51:42 AM
It's a one-off, but built by somebody quite well-known who later build and sold cars commercially
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 26, 2017, 08:19:50 AM
Did he build and sell competition cars?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 26, 2017, 08:41:04 AM
Interesting question. He was mostly involved with competition cars, but the cars he marketed himself were road going
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 26, 2017, 11:18:34 AM
I can't find a photo of the younger man, but is this John Britten?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 26, 2017, 11:21:09 AM
Not him. In fact, I don't know if that is the constructor at the wheel
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 26, 2017, 11:47:07 AM
People involved in motor sport but who built cars for the road are few and far between - long shot - Frank Costin?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 26, 2017, 11:56:39 AM
(Slightly) less well known, but you're heading in the right direction
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 26, 2017, 01:17:06 PM
John Sprinzel?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on October 26, 2017, 01:27:03 PM
Jem Marsh?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 27, 2017, 04:23:38 AM
Not either of those
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 27, 2017, 04:37:24 AM
Neville Trickett?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 27, 2017, 04:49:02 AM
Nope
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Allan L on October 27, 2017, 08:54:03 AM
How about Len Terry?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 27, 2017, 10:09:00 AM
Not him either
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on October 27, 2017, 11:15:16 AM
Surely not Colin Chapman?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: FrontMan on October 27, 2017, 01:40:22 PM
.....the young chap looks like Tony Crook.  Perhaps they used the same barber.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 30, 2017, 06:46:02 AM
Not either of those - less known, certainly
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 30, 2017, 07:40:42 AM
Ralph Broad?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 30, 2017, 08:35:06 AM
Not Ralph
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on October 30, 2017, 11:09:53 AM
One of the Walkletts?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 30, 2017, 11:21:00 AM
No
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 30, 2017, 12:01:31 PM
Were the road cars marketed by this man based on the Austin/Morris mini?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 30, 2017, 12:17:17 PM
No!
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 30, 2017, 02:27:53 PM
Powered by Hillman Imp?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 31, 2017, 05:16:01 AM
No it pre-dates the Imp by a couple of decades
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 31, 2017, 05:32:57 AM
Quote from: barrett on October 31, 2017, 05:16:01 AM
No it pre-dates the Imp by a couple of decades

Sorry - I meant was the road car he built powered by Imp, but clearly not anyway........

I suspect the puzzle car is Ford sidevalve powered.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 31, 2017, 06:02:24 AM
ah right, of course.

Side valve Ford is the way to go
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 31, 2017, 06:56:50 AM
I'm going to try a different tack - you say the builder is reasonably well-known in motor sport. Was he a driver?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 31, 2017, 07:05:44 AM
He did drive, but he's not famous particularly for his own competition record.

He is very well known - every puzzler knows his name, and was an important figure in the pre- and postwar specials/tuning world...
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 31, 2017, 09:20:20 AM
Surely not Sydney Allard?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on October 31, 2017, 09:24:12 AM
Derek Buckler?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 31, 2017, 09:59:05 AM
Not them!
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on October 31, 2017, 01:03:26 PM
Leslie Ballamy?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on October 31, 2017, 01:19:39 PM
Yes! Locked for you...
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: nicanary on October 31, 2017, 01:29:36 PM
Argh! I thought of him last night and then forgot!
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on November 03, 2017, 05:50:47 AM
It's been a couple of days so I'll unlock this now... the solution should now be obvious
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Djetset on November 03, 2017, 06:06:20 AM
I hate to step in and steal someone else's point, but this wouldn't be the L.M.B. Epoch would it from 1936?
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on November 03, 2017, 06:09:01 AM
Quote from: barrett on November 03, 2017, 05:50:47 AM
It's been a couple of days so I'll unlock this now... the solution should now be obvious

Sorry but I've been working on it.
There's scant information on the 'Net so can't say for definite what it is.
It's not the one and only Epoch made (or was it just a drawing?) because that was a 4-seater.
There are various Ballamy cars from the 1930s - the Ellembee and LMB Special for instance but I think this one must be the Austin 7-based Doodle-Bug.   I can't find anything else which might fit.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on November 03, 2017, 06:34:23 AM
Quite right, it's not the Epoch -

It is one of the ones mentioned by you, Carnut, so locked again - pick one!
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on November 03, 2017, 07:12:07 AM
Quote from: barrett on November 03, 2017, 06:34:23 AM
Quite right, it's not the Epoch -

It is one of the ones mentioned by you, Carnut, so locked again - pick one!

Thanks.  I guess it's not the Doodle-Bug then..
So can you leave this with me for a day or two please and I hope to verify which of the other two it is?

Many thanks.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on November 03, 2017, 07:25:35 AM
Yep, you're nearly there so it's locked until you can answer! (Your postman will bring the answer, don't worry)
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on November 03, 2017, 07:30:53 AM
Quote from: barrett on November 03, 2017, 07:25:35 AM
Yep, you're nearly there so it's locked until you can answer! (Your postman will bring the answer, don't worry)

:thumbsup:
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: Carnut on November 03, 2017, 01:06:36 PM
OK, got it!
I'd overlooked that the Doodlebug was Ford Model Y / 10 based and the puzzle car is clearly Austin-based, so it couldn't be the Doodlebug; nor could it be the LMB Special as that was Ford V8-based.
So by a process of elimination it had to be the Ellembee, though I wanted to see it in writing before giving my answer: the 1935 Ellembee Special, based on a 1928 Austin Chummy.
I don't know where you managed to find that good-quality picture though; I still haven't seen it anywhere, though it and another picture (both not good quality) do appear in the Ballamy book.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391
Post by: barrett on November 03, 2017, 01:09:23 PM
That's the one, well found.

Just realised I may have thrown some people off the scent earlier as I said I didn't think it was Austin-based (as all his other cars of the period were Ford-based) and I thought this one had the Ford 10hp engine in, at least. Sorry if I accidentally mislead anyone!

I purchased this photograph earlier in the year. As far as I know it's not been published before, but its obviously from the same set of images that are used, poorly, in the book. Tony Russell had never seen it, either
Title: Re: Barrett's #391 - Solved - Leslie Ballamy's 1935 Ellembee Special
Post by: nicanary on November 03, 2017, 03:11:59 PM
This photo was in a 1946 issue of Motor Sport magazine, and supposedly shows the LMB Special.  However, it looks too small to be the V8-engined car, and that radiator shell looks mighty familiar. The rear bodywork doesn't match however. It's just that I reckon they could be one and the same car as the puzzle subject.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391 - Solved - Leslie Ballamy's 1935 Ellembee Special
Post by: Carnut on November 03, 2017, 07:05:04 PM
No, it's neither the LMB Special nor the Ellembee Special as it's the Ford-based Doodlebug...
I won't be posting that as a puzzle then!
Title: Re: Barrett's #391 - Solved - Leslie Ballamy's 1935 Ellembee Special
Post by: nicanary on November 04, 2017, 05:16:02 AM
Quote from: Carnut on November 03, 2017, 07:05:04 PM
No, it's neither the LMB Special nor the Ellembee Special as it's the Ford-based Doodlebug...
I won't be posting that as a puzzle then!

AARRGGHH! Sorry. That's another wasted potential puzzle.........it's hard enough to find new ones as it is.

Better this way, though, than someone cheating  ;D.

(Motor Sport always were prone to errors which they (that is, Bods) would not own up to. The latest issue mentions a Citroen DS90.)
Title: Re: Barrett's #391 - Solved - Leslie Ballamy's 1935 Ellembee Special
Post by: Carnut on November 04, 2017, 11:40:01 AM
That picture was actually captioned "L.M.B. Special" but whilst it is an LMB Special it's not what is usually referred to as the LMB Special.  It is the Doodlebug as you can see from the picture below:

Title: Re: Barrett's #391 - Solved - Leslie Ballamy's 1935 Ellembee Special
Post by: nicanary on November 04, 2017, 12:10:58 PM
An attempt at an Alfa Monza radiator shell.
Title: Re: Barrett's #391 - Solved - Leslie Ballamy's 1935 Ellembee Special
Post by: Carnut on November 04, 2017, 12:48:14 PM
Quote from: nicanary on November 04, 2017, 12:10:58 PM
An attempt at an Alfa Monza radiator shell.

I believe it might actually have been taken from one..