AutoPuzzles - The Internet's Museum of Rare Cars!

Puzzles, Games and Name That Car => Solved AutoPuzzles => 2017 => Topic started by: nicanary on January 02, 2017, 05:47:51 AM

Title: Solved NIC#740 - 1964 KJC Mk.3 by Ken Code
Post by: nicanary on January 02, 2017, 05:47:51 AM
Marque and maker, please.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on February 21, 2017, 05:32:22 AM
Experts?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: Willie McCrum on February 21, 2017, 08:11:26 AM
Pringett Mistrale ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on February 21, 2017, 08:18:34 AM
Quote from: Willie McCrum on February 21, 2017, 08:11:26 AM
Pringett Mistrale ?

Similar colour scheme, but that's about it. Not a Mistrale.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: Willie McCrum on February 21, 2017, 05:49:33 PM
Obviously losing wahtever touch I had.....If it isn't a Royale RP3, I have another suggestion - but little confidence !
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on February 22, 2017, 03:55:54 AM
Quote from: Willie McCrum on February 21, 2017, 05:49:33 PM
Obviously losing wahtever touch I had.....If it isn't a Royale RP3, I have another suggestion - but little confidence !

Not a Royale, but ask as many questions as you like. It's like that stuff you throw at the wall - some of it might stick.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: 250gto on February 22, 2017, 07:44:50 AM
My initial thought was that this is an early fomula ford but some google searching suggests the engine looks wrong. Is there any Formula Ford in it?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: Allan L on February 22, 2017, 07:58:38 AM
I'd have guessed at an early Formula Ford 2000, but not my period so can't continue, even if I'm right!
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on February 22, 2017, 08:16:47 AM
Not Formula Ford, nor Formula Ford 2000. Nothing to do with Ford whatsoever.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: Willie McCrum on February 22, 2017, 11:26:36 AM
Formula France ??
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on February 22, 2017, 11:29:04 AM
Quote from: Willie McCrum on February 22, 2017, 11:26:36 AM
Formula France ??

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: Willie McCrum on February 23, 2017, 06:34:38 PM
I note, somewhat belatedly, that the exhaust is on the 'wrong' side for a F.Ford in any case.
I do recall Formula Talbot from the dim and distant, but can't remember what side their exhaust systems were on.
Their chassis were nearly all Spartons too, if memory serves.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on February 24, 2017, 04:08:55 AM
Quote from: Willie McCrum on February 23, 2017, 06:34:38 PM
I note, somewhat belatedly, that the exhaust is on the 'wrong' side for a F.Ford in any case.
I do recall Formula Talbot from the dim and distant, but can't remember what side their exhaust systems were on.
Their chassis were nearly all Spartons too, if memory serves.

Nothing to do with Formula Talbot, although there is a distant connection to that marque.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: richard cuyler on March 24, 2017, 09:18:40 AM
Looks like a cross-flow cylinder head. A Simca 1000 unit perhaps?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on March 24, 2017, 12:50:36 PM
Quote from: richard cuyler on March 24, 2017, 09:18:40 AM
Looks like a cross-flow cylinder head. A Simca 1000 unit perhaps?

Not a Simca engine.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: D-type on March 24, 2017, 03:50:02 PM
Let's start again.  Is it French?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on March 24, 2017, 05:01:21 PM
Quote from: D-type on March 24, 2017, 03:50:02 PM
Let's start again.  Is it French?

It was not built in France, but part of it is French.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: D-type on April 01, 2017, 08:00:30 AM
French engine, so Peugeot?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on April 01, 2017, 08:20:47 AM
Quote from: D-type on April 01, 2017, 08:00:30 AM
French engine, so Peugeot?

Exactly!
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: el_monty on April 01, 2017, 08:50:02 AM
Built in the UK?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: D-type on April 01, 2017, 09:59:06 AM
Australian built?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on April 01, 2017, 11:50:52 AM
Quote from: D-type on April 01, 2017, 09:59:06 AM
Australian built?

Not UK - it  is Australian.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: Willie McCrum on April 03, 2017, 03:19:46 AM
Could this possibly be a Rennmax ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on April 03, 2017, 04:50:44 AM
Quote from: Willie McCrum on April 03, 2017, 03:19:46 AM
Could this possibly be a Rennmax ?

Nothing like as common as that.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 04, 2017, 06:06:35 AM
Pros?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 05, 2017, 09:10:37 AM
Is it displayed in a museum ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 05, 2017, 11:52:48 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 05, 2017, 09:10:37 AM
Is it displayed in a museum ?

No. The photo was taken when the car was for sale.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 06, 2017, 05:34:40 AM
Peugeot 204 engine ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 06, 2017, 05:51:14 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 06, 2017, 05:34:40 AM
Peugeot 204 engine ?

Not a 204, but earlier. I don't know for sure, but probably from a 203.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 06, 2017, 06:11:42 AM
Was the car for sale in Australia ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 07, 2017, 05:34:12 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 06, 2017, 06:11:42 AM
Was the car for sale in Australia ?

Yes.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 05:36:57 AM
Was it sold at an auction ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 07, 2017, 06:00:44 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 05:36:57 AM
Was it sold at an auction ?

No. For sale at a fixed price but offers considered.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 06:16:23 AM
Was the car built between 1960 and 1965 ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 07, 2017, 06:26:41 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 06:16:23 AM
Was the car built between 1960 and 1965 ?

Yes.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 07:10:23 AM
1963 ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 07, 2017, 07:45:27 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 07:10:23 AM
1963 ?

My records show one year later!
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 11:40:45 AM
Lynx ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 07, 2017, 12:33:09 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 11:40:45 AM
Lynx ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 12:59:23 PM
Did it compete in Australian Formula 2 ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 07, 2017, 01:06:52 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 12:59:23 PM
Did it compete in Australian Formula 2 ?

I believe it was built originally for Formula Junior, but took part in Formula 3 races.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 06:07:09 PM
Jolus ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 08, 2017, 04:55:09 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 07, 2017, 06:07:09 PM
Jolus ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 08, 2017, 09:38:56 AM
Koala ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 08, 2017, 12:22:12 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 08, 2017, 09:38:56 AM
Koala ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 08, 2017, 03:20:47 PM
Sasin ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 08, 2017, 03:28:02 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 08, 2017, 03:20:47 PM
Sasin ?

Not that.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 08, 2017, 03:36:19 PM
Cadjar ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 08, 2017, 03:41:15 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 08, 2017, 03:36:19 PM
Cadjar ?

No.

(It's going to take you a long time! There were a lot of homebuilt F3 cars in Australia during the 1960s. A clue - this one was named after the initials of the builder.)
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 09, 2017, 04:32:11 PM
DSM by Dave Sullivan ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 09, 2017, 06:09:56 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 09, 2017, 04:32:11 PM
DSM by Dave Sullivan ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 04:17:23 AM
Peugeot 203 engine was 1290 cc. Was its displacement decreased to less than 1100 cc ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 04:37:18 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 04:17:23 AM
Peugeot 203 engine was 1290 cc. Was its displacement decreased to less than 1100 cc ?

Sorry oko94, I don't know any more. I have just rechecked my source and there is no reference to the engine size. I also think I may have been wrong about the car taking part in FJ and F3 events. It is more likely that it raced in single-seater events against cars with much bigger engines so possibly the engine was not reduced in size in order to qualify for the F3 category.

My apologies for providing misleading information.

(Here's another photo of the car taken in period, which shows the type of race it entered. Apparently this race was for Group O & M cars, which is new to me!)
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 05:07:59 AM
Monaco HS by Richard Hilyear and Derek Smith ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 05:21:19 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 05:07:59 AM
Monaco HS by Richard Hilyear and Derek Smith ?

Not that.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 05:27:19 AM
I have found out that Groups M & O are designations by the HSRCA for historic racing cars for the period 1961-1969. Obviously this is not the title for the category in period.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 05:49:58 AM
TAD ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 06:16:38 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 05:49:58 AM
TAD ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 07:02:32 AM
Has this Peugeot special competed in a Group O & M race after 2010 ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 07:14:53 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 07:02:32 AM
Has this Peugeot special competed in a Group O & M race after 2010 ?

It was definitely being raced in 2008, but I don't know about later dates.

I have found out that the engine was from a 1958 Peugeot 403 - 1468cc. So I was wrong about FJ and F3 unless the engine has been changed.
Sorry.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 07:42:34 AM
BBM ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 08:22:13 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 07:42:34 AM
BBM ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 08:32:39 AM
FMZ ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 08:33:45 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 08:32:39 AM
FMZ ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 08:40:17 AM
RALT Mk V ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 11:21:07 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 08:40:17 AM
RALT Mk V ?

No.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 11:30:38 AM
GWG ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 11:33:49 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 12, 2017, 11:30:38 AM
GWG ?

No.

(It is on the internet - if you know the builder's name and Google it, there are several entries  ;D)
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 18, 2017, 07:44:06 AM
Quote from: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 04:37:18 AM
(Here's another photo of the car taken in period, which shows the type of race it entered. Apparently this race was for Group O & M cars, which is new to me!)

Was that photo taken in 1964 ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 18, 2017, 07:55:20 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 18, 2017, 07:44:06 AM
Quote from: nicanary on May 12, 2017, 04:37:18 AM
(Here's another photo of the car taken in period, which shows the type of race it entered. Apparently this race was for Group O & M cars, which is new to me!)

Was that photo taken in 1964 ?

I don't know. It was on the information for the car on the "for sale" site.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 18, 2017, 08:38:57 AM
Quote from: nicanary on May 08, 2017, 03:41:15 PM
(A clue - this one was named after the initials of the builder.)

Was the car's name an initialism (like DB) or an abbreviation (like Deebee) ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 18, 2017, 08:50:16 AM
An initialism. Three letters representing the 2 first names and surname of the builder.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 18, 2017, 09:12:51 AM
Was it the only race car built by this builder ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 18, 2017, 12:20:30 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 18, 2017, 09:12:51 AM
Was it the only race car built by this builder ?

I think he almost certainly built at least 2 other cars.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 18, 2017, 12:26:18 PM
Were these two other cars single seaters too ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 18, 2017, 12:44:19 PM
Quote from: oko94 on May 18, 2017, 12:26:18 PM
Were these two other cars single seaters too ?

I don't know. This car was called the Mk 3. I think it's very possible he built two before this one!  ;D
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 19, 2017, 05:26:19 AM
Is the sale ad still online ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 19, 2017, 05:27:32 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 19, 2017, 05:26:19 AM
Is the sale ad still online ?

Yes.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 19, 2017, 06:57:59 AM
Was it sold by an individual or by a car trading company ?
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 19, 2017, 07:03:25 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 19, 2017, 06:57:59 AM
Was it sold by an individual or by a car trading company ?

It was listed on a car sales website, and also on e-bay.
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: oko94 on May 19, 2017, 07:28:39 AM
1964 KJC MK3 by Ken Code
Title: Re: NIC#740
Post by: nicanary on May 19, 2017, 08:00:31 AM
Quote from: oko94 on May 19, 2017, 07:28:39 AM
1964 KJC MK3 by Ken Code

Yes! I admire your perseverance, and it results in a well-earned point.
Title: Re: Solved NIC#740 - 1964 KJC Mk.3 by Ken Code
Post by: oko94 on May 19, 2017, 08:32:31 AM
Thanks for my 726th point !

It was strangely hard to find despite the numerous data I had gathered...