AutoPuzzles - The Internet's Museum of Rare Cars!

Puzzles, Games and Name That Car => Solved AutoPuzzles => 2019 => Topic started by: gte4289 on October 05, 2019, 03:04:30 PM

Title: solved: GTE 173 - 1971 Ridge Runner ASV
Post by: gte4289 on October 05, 2019, 03:04:30 PM
Please identify this vehicle for a point.
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 13, 2019, 06:07:35 AM
Experts?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 23, 2019, 06:21:23 PM
No questions or interest from the Rookies and Experts on this one. Pros?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 23, 2019, 06:35:41 PM
Car for children ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 23, 2019, 08:06:19 PM
Quote from: oko94 on October 23, 2019, 06:35:41 PM
Car for children ?
No
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 24, 2019, 12:44:41 AM
Made in USA ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 24, 2019, 02:47:09 AM
Quote from: oko94 on October 24, 2019, 12:44:41 AM
Made in USA ?
Yes
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 24, 2019, 04:19:46 AM
Built between 1955 and 1960 ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 24, 2019, 05:20:14 AM
Quote from: oko94 on October 24, 2019, 04:19:46 AM
Built between 1955 and 1960 ?
No, later
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: kwgibbs on October 24, 2019, 09:42:27 AM
Was it an experimental car from GM?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 24, 2019, 09:46:22 AM
Quote from: kwgibbs on October 24, 2019, 09:42:27 AM
Was it an experimental car from GM?
No
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: kwgibbs on October 24, 2019, 06:59:45 PM
Was it a one-off built by an individual?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 24, 2019, 07:15:07 PM
Quote from: kwgibbs on October 24, 2019, 06:59:45 PM
Was it a one-off built by an individual?
No, it was manufactured by a company and in production for a few years.
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: Djetset on October 24, 2019, 10:27:27 PM
Any connection with a King Midget Model 3?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 24, 2019, 10:55:47 PM
Quote from: Djetset on October 24, 2019, 10:27:27 PM
Any connection with a King Midget Model 3?
None of which I'm aware
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: Wendax on October 25, 2019, 02:36:38 AM
Was it street legal?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 25, 2019, 06:37:07 AM
Quote from: Wendax on October 25, 2019, 02:36:38 AM
Was it street legal?
Well... motor vehicle laws in the US vary from state to state and change often. Even for someone like me (an automotive industry attorney), it can be difficult to say for certain what was legal and what was not--decades ago--in 50 different states. That being said, I do know that motor vehicle laws were generally less restrictive back when this thing was new. Even so, I doubt it was ever street-legal in any of the 48 contiguous states. One of the two non-contiguous states doesn't matter, because no one in that state would have owned this thing. That leaves only one state to consider, and if this thing was street-legal anywhere, that would definitely be the place!
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 25, 2019, 06:40:38 AM
Quote from: gte4289 on October 25, 2019, 06:37:07 AM
Quote from: Wendax on October 25, 2019, 02:36:38 AM
Was it street legal?
Well... motor vehicle laws in the US vary from state to state and change often. Even for someone like me (an automotive industry attorney), it can be difficult to say for certain what was legal and what was not--decades ago--in 50 different states. That being said, I do know that motor vehicle laws were generally less restrictive back when this thing was new. Even so, I doubt it was ever street-legal in any of the 48 contiguous states. One of the two non-contiguous states doesn't matter, because no one in that state would have owned this thing. That leaves only one state to consider, and if this thing was street-legal anywhere, that would definitely be the place!
Sorry, to answer your question: not street legal
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: Djetset on October 25, 2019, 09:34:20 AM
Was it a vehicle intended for theme parks rides, such as the Autopia 'cars' at Disneyland?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 25, 2019, 12:00:37 PM
Quote from: Djetset on October 25, 2019, 09:34:20 AM
Was it a vehicle intended for theme parks rides, such as the Autopia 'cars' at Disneyland?
No, not for that
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 25, 2019, 12:09:52 PM
Was it intended for educational purposes ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 25, 2019, 03:57:00 PM
Quote from: oko94 on October 25, 2019, 12:09:52 PM
Was it intended for educational purposes ?
No
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 05:21:17 AM
Was it built for entertainment purposes ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 07:44:19 AM
Quote from: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 05:21:17 AM
Was it built for entertainment purposes ?
Yes, its primary purpose is entertainment
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 08:09:31 AM
Built for television ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 08:50:30 AM
Quote from: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 08:09:31 AM
Built for television ?
No
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 08:51:27 AM
Built for a movie ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 12:38:25 PM
Quote from: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 08:51:27 AM
Built for a movie ?
No
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 03:41:37 PM
Was it intended to be used at holiday resorts ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 03:51:27 PM
Quote from: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 03:41:37 PM
Was it intended to be used at holiday resorts ?
While they may have been used at holiday resorts, I don't believe that was necessarily the manufacturer's intention.
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 04:24:44 PM
Was it used at fairgrounds ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 05:05:43 PM
Quote from: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 04:24:44 PM
Was it used at fairgrounds ?
Not an intended purpose. These were primarily marketed to the public for personal use.
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 05:25:55 PM
Quote from: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 07:44:19 AM
Quote from: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 05:21:17 AM
Was it built for entertainment purposes ?
Yes, its primary purpose is entertainment
I think I understood your use of the term "entertainment" in a broader sense than you intended. A more specific term to describe this vehicle's primary purpose would be "recreation."
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 05:27:29 PM
Beach car ?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 05:29:50 PM
Quote from: oko94 on October 26, 2019, 05:27:29 PM
Beach car ?
No, but this is much more closely aligned with the vehicle's actual purpose than for use in movies, television and theme parks.
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 26, 2019, 05:38:10 PM
By the way, Reply #16 may seem like a rambling, circuitous response to a simple question, but look again. ;)
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: pnegyesi on October 26, 2019, 10:48:10 PM
is this a kid's car built in Hawaii?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 27, 2019, 12:25:37 AM
Quote from: pnegyesi on October 26, 2019, 10:48:10 PM
is this a kid's car built in Hawaii?
Not a kid's car (see Reply #11) and not built in Hawaii.
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: pnegyesi on October 27, 2019, 12:27:13 AM
built in Alaska for getting by in the snow?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 27, 2019, 12:31:41 AM
Quote from: pnegyesi on October 27, 2019, 12:27:13 AM
built in Alaska for getting by in the snow?
Not built in Alaska, but made for use in snow
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: pnegyesi on October 27, 2019, 12:55:06 AM
Ridge Runner?
Title: Re: GTE 173
Post by: gte4289 on October 27, 2019, 01:41:30 AM
Quote from: pnegyesi on October 27, 2019, 12:55:06 AM
Ridge Runner?
:)