AutoPuzzles - The Internet's Museum of Rare Cars!

AutoPuzzles Today => Features, Stories and Photos => Rare Car of the Week => Topic started by: Otto Puzzell on December 28, 2006, 08:17:02 AM

Title: Puzzle #154 - Solved! Eliot Cricket III
Post by: Otto Puzzell on December 28, 2006, 08:17:02 AM


Know what it is?

Please, respond below and let us know what make and model you think you see here.


If you haven't registered yet, you need to do so in order to reply with your answer.  You can do so by clicking here (http://www.autopuzzles.com/forum/index.php?action=register).

Also, please be sure to check out our other puzzles.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on December 29, 2006, 09:39:19 PM
DANGER, Will Robinson! DANGER!!!!!   :o
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: porridgehead on December 29, 2006, 10:28:30 PM
Having decided that his tinfoil hat was effectively protecting his brain, Scott's next project was his car.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 04, 2007, 04:30:05 AM
None of the above.

The device at the top has the same function (though not the same configuration) as a 'safety feature' currently in vogue.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Tifosi on January 04, 2007, 02:54:01 PM
My guess is that the device at the top is akin to the modern CHMSL, but I still have no idea what kind of vehicle it is.  I'm guessing late '30's, and most likely American or European manufacturer...



Dan
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: porridgehead on January 04, 2007, 03:38:55 PM
And here I was thinking it was a hot air balloon. Silly me.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 04, 2007, 04:50:06 PM
Quote from: Tifosi on January 04, 2007, 02:54:01 PM
My guess is that the device at the top is akin to the modern CHMSL, but I still have no idea what kind of vehicle it is.  I'm guessing late '30's, and most likely American or European manufacturer...

Dan

Not a CHMSL. Your geographical guess is sound, however.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 04, 2007, 04:50:28 PM
Quote from: porridgehead on January 04, 2007, 03:38:55 PM
And here I was thinking it was a hot air balloon. Silly me.

Yes, quite.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Arthur Dent on January 04, 2007, 05:47:23 PM
I'd suspect a navigation device of some sort.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 05, 2007, 05:16:38 AM
Well....sort of.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on January 05, 2007, 08:00:01 AM
I think the excresence on the roof is a distant kin to the satellite radio antennae so much in vogue today.  Some sort of radio antenna, most likely for receiving code burst transmissions from intergalactic travellers like Zaphed Beeblebrox or the like.   ???

It is clearly rear engined, so I am going to guess it is a VW or NSU based thingamabob and was some sort of emergency vehicle used in moutainous terrain where radio reception was poor. Perhaps it was designed to replace the fabled Saint Bernard in Alpine rescue missions?  The fact that it has no fenders is a clue. Unfortunately, I have no idea what it is a clue TO!    :-[
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 05, 2007, 10:55:09 AM
No, it doesn't accept transmissions, radio or otherwise. It emits radiation.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on January 05, 2007, 11:21:52 AM
It emits radiation

What? LIke a sound truck???? ???  Or radiation as in radar waves?   

Its a mystery to me why the device on top has little winglets on it or why the "tail" has a vestigial dorsal fin. Both would indicate some sort of aerodynamic assistance, but why a vehicle that clearly has a top speed of 37.2 kph would NEED such assistance, I cannot figure.

Perhaps a land speed record in the Ugly Vehicle category?     :P
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Tifosi on January 05, 2007, 12:06:58 PM
It's a prototype of Corbin's taxi from THE FIFTH ELEMENT.

Dan
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 05, 2007, 12:54:01 PM
Not a sound (unless it squeaks) or radar emitter.

Not a Fifth Element Taxi prototype.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on January 05, 2007, 06:03:38 PM
Not a sound (unless it squeaks) or radar emitter.


Well, then it must be a light. Unless it is scent emitter.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 06, 2007, 03:46:59 AM
QuoteWell, then it must be a light.

Yes!
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on January 06, 2007, 03:46:55 PM
GREAT!   ;D

Now all I need know is who built it and why and I will  be able to die happy!    ::)

The only reason I can think of for such a light would be for use as a "Follow Me" car at an airport.  Either that, or as a clever device to lure unsuspecting motorists in the Alps to drive over a cliff and kill themselves.

Oh, wait!  How about a pace car kinda thingie?

As you can tell, being privy to the knowledge that this thing has a big damn light on the roof advances my understanding of it origins or history not at all..... :(
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: SeaLion on January 06, 2007, 04:03:16 PM
Perhaps it was a research vehicle to test UV head-lights (black light)?

All the tin foil was probably there to avoid that the peoples inside the car got heavy sun-burns.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 07, 2007, 02:22:32 AM
Not a UV light, a 'follow me' light, a pace-car thingy, or an over-the-cliff lure.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: GTO48 on January 07, 2007, 04:27:44 AM
Based on the appearance of the tires, Is it from the 50's?

Is it based on VW underpinnings?

Is it's purpose for remote radio/TV broadcasting?
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 07, 2007, 06:58:52 AM
it is a contemporary of the very earliest Beetles, and shares some similar features, though I don't think their are any VW parts in this car.

This vehicle is designed to do only what ordinary cars did, only differently. It has no special purpose beyond the transport of people and some of their belongings.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Arthur Dent on January 07, 2007, 02:22:19 PM
Is it possibly an attempt at a self driving car?
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 03:21:11 AM
No sir. Here is another view of the car. This should clear things right up!
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Ultra on January 08, 2007, 03:23:52 AM
Quote from: KarnUtz on January 08, 2007, 03:21:11 AM
This should clear things right up!

Yep.  Clear as mud.

:scratch:
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 03:27:41 AM
I was being fac....fas....I was kidding!
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Ultra on January 08, 2007, 03:30:05 AM
Quote from: KarnUtz on January 08, 2007, 03:27:41 AM
I was being fac....fas....I was kidding!

We don't need any more goats.  We need heroes.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 03:38:21 AM
 ???
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 04:02:03 AM
I forgot the  ;)
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: GTO48 on January 08, 2007, 04:07:26 AM
is the device at the top a high mounted brake or fog light or similar?

Amphibious?
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 04:25:20 AM
It is a type of light. The car is not amphibious.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: pieter on January 08, 2007, 06:00:58 AM
If the roof gadget is some kind of distance sensor to stop it from running into things, it obviously doesn't work, judging by the dents on the nose...
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 12:07:36 PM
It is a type of light
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Arthur Dent on January 08, 2007, 12:58:35 PM
Perhaps a laser?
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
Well, since the car appears to have no other front mounted lights, perhaps this IS the headlight? And taillight as well, from the rear. And when turning, a little bird pops out of either side and says "Cuckoo. Cuckoo"

Now, of course, the question remains: Why would anyone put the headlight on the roof?  Perhaps the car was an advertising medium for a manuafacturer of cupolas?   ???  Or perhaps the designed had broken several headlamps by running into things, people and other cars and was determined to put the damn thing someplace where it couldn't get broken?  Then again, it may an ultraviolet light and you have to wear special goggles to see anything.

I will tell you this much, Mr. Utz. This is one of the most damnably consternating puzzles yet, one which YOU, as the poser of questions, must take great pride in posting. But we will GET you, sir. Oh yes we will. Someday, someplace, when you least expect it, we will find you and we will beat you severely about the head and shoulders with our cudgels until you reveal the answer to this riddle.  I haven't slept in three days. I'm losing weight. My cat and my dog avoid me.  'Tis a terrible curse you have visited upon us, sir.

VENGEANCE IS MINE, SAYETH MG!      ;D
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Tifosi on January 08, 2007, 01:31:40 PM
Is it a Rumpler?



Dan
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Tifosi on January 08, 2007, 01:33:29 PM
Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
Well, since the car appears to have no other front mounted lights, perhaps this IS the headlight? And taillight as well, from the rear. And when turning, a little bird pops out of either side and says "Cuckoo. Cuckoo"

Now, of course, the question remains: Why would anyone put the headlight on the roof?  Perhaps the car was an advertising medium for a manuafacturer of cupolas?   ???  Or perhaps the designed had broken several headlamps by running into things, people and other cars and was determined to put the damn thing someplace where it couldn't get broken?  Then again, it may an ultraviolet light and you have to wear special goggles to see anything.

I will tell you this much, Mr. Utz. This is one of the most damnably consternating puzzles yet, one which YOU, as the poser of questions, must take great pride in posting. But we will GET you, sir. Oh yes we will. Someday, someplace, when you least expect it, we will find you and we will beat you severely about the head and shoulders with our cudgels until you reveal the answer to this riddle.  I haven't slept in three days. I'm losing weight. My cat and my dog avoid me.  'Tis a terrible curse you have visited upon us, sir.

VENGEANCE IS MINE, SAYETH MG!      ;D

Stewie Griffin lives ar t Auto Puzzles.com...



Dan
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on January 08, 2007, 02:03:11 PM
Stewie Griffin lives ar t Auto Puzzles.com...

Hmmmm.....you may have a point there. I'd ask Rich for his take on this but his fees are outrageous!   

Personality

Stewie is extremely intelligent and speaks with an affected English accent. His Machiavellian ambitions not only include world domination, but matricide. In the commentary of one episode, MacFarlane reveals that Stewie's evil personality is a result of Lois smoking marijuana while pregnant with him, which she said in a dream sequence in the episode "Mr. Griffin Goes to Washington": "You're an evil child! Why, oh why did I smoke pot while I was pregnant with you?".

Stewie has a sophisticated style, attitude and mannerisms, juxtaposed with typical childish interests. He enjoys literature such as Marlowe's Faust, Machiavelli, and Sun-Tzu (the latter two he read for advice on world domination). He cites pop culture references that date much farther back than his age would permit; however he has also shown an affinity for children's singer Raffi and has a hypnotic attraction to the Teletubbies. Stewie also succumbs to other failings of children his age: in "Emission Impossible", Lois subdues Stewie by blowing on his stomach. At one point Peter convinces Stewie that he has vanished into thin air by playing peek-a-boo with him. MacFarlane has stated that Stewie is meant to represent the general helplessness of an infant through the eyes of an adult. Consequently, his longing to conquer the world is based upon his desire for control over his own life.

Stewie is a scientific genius, apparently able to master physics and mechanical engineering, as well as construct a bewildering variety of machines including lasers, advanced fighter-jets, mind control devices, weather-control devices, robots, and even time machines. He frequently uses these devices to cope with the stresses of infant life (such as the pain from teething and his hatred of broccoli), to kill Lois, or for other purposes, such as destroying all of the sperm in Peter's body so he will not have to compete with another baby.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Tifosi on January 08, 2007, 02:19:53 PM
Werd..


Dan
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 03:48:26 PM
Quote from: Tifosi on January 08, 2007, 01:31:40 PM
Is it a Rumpler?

Dan

No. It shares it's name with an underacheiving small car sold some decades later.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 03:57:51 PM
Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
Well, since the car appears to have no other front mounted lights, perhaps this IS the headlight?

Yes!

Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
And taillight as well, from the rear. And when turning, a little bird pops out of either side and says "Cuckoo. Cuckoo"

No, and no. The thing that makes this configuration of headlight worthwhile would make a taillight decidedly less worthwhile.

Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
Now, of course, the question remains: Why would anyone put the headlight on the roof? 

What's important about the headlight is not where it is, but what it's capable of doing.

Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
Perhaps the car was an advertising medium for a manufacturer of cupolas?

No.

Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
Or perhaps the designed had broken several headlamps by running into things, people and other cars and was determined to put the damn thing someplace where it couldn't get broken? 

While those maladies might have befallen the builder, making the light less susceptible to breakage was not his objective, to the best of my knowledge.

Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
Then again, it may an ultraviolet light and you have to wear special goggles to see anything.

No

Quote from: MG on January 08, 2007, 01:15:44 PM
I will tell you this much, Mr. Utz. This is one of the most damnably consternating puzzles yet, one which YOU, as the poser of questions, must take great pride in posting. But we will GET you, sir. Oh yes we will. Someday, someplace, when you least expect it, we will find you and we will beat you severely about the head and shoulders with our cudgels until you reveal the answer to this riddle.  I haven't slept in three days. I'm losing weight. My cat and my dog avoid me.  'Tis a terrible curse you have visited upon us, sir.

VENGEANCE IS MINE, SAYETH MG!      ;D

C'est la vie.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 08, 2007, 04:02:33 PM
Quote from: Arthur Dent on January 08, 2007, 12:58:35 PM
Perhaps a laser?

No.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: GTO48 on January 09, 2007, 01:04:44 AM
Headlight turns with the vehicle like Preston Tucker envisioned? And as some of the new Lexus' are doing?

Is this an early vehicle by Tucker?
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 09, 2007, 02:34:02 AM
QuoteHeadlight turns with the vehicle like Preston Tucker envisioned?

Yes!

But this car was built before the Tucker.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: GTO48 on January 09, 2007, 05:08:18 AM
Very early Tatra prototype?
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 09, 2007, 05:44:34 AM
No. This car was US built.
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on January 17, 2007, 01:55:47 PM
:bump:
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on February 20, 2007, 04:47:31 PM
                                                                                                               
:bump: follow the bouncing bumps
                                                                           
:bump: follow the bouncing bumps
                                     
:bump: follow the bouncing bumps
:bump: follow the bouncing bumps
                                     
:bump: follow the bouncing bumps
                                                                           
:bump: follow the bouncing bumps
                                                                                                               
:bump: follow the bouncing bumps
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: erbas on February 24, 2007, 02:31:31 PM
1938 Eliot Cricket III
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: MG on February 24, 2007, 03:37:31 PM
You mean to tell me there was an Eliot Cricket I and an Eliot Cricket II?    :o

Ridiculous...... >:(
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: GTO48 on February 25, 2007, 03:18:14 AM
Quote from: MG on February 24, 2007, 03:37:31 PM
You mean to tell me there was an Eliot Cricket I and an Eliot Cricket II?    :o

Ridiculous...... >:(

while it is apparently true that this is in fact the third in the series of Elliot Crickets...  It still doesn't answer: "Were does karn come up with this stuff?"
Title: Re: Puzzle #154
Post by: Otto Puzzell on February 25, 2007, 03:55:37 AM
Quote from: erbas on February 24, 2007, 02:31:31 PM
1938 Eliot Cricket III


Yes!

Samuel Eliot, ASAE, was an automotive experimenter and visionary. The Cricket III incorporated many of his ahead-of-the-time ideas; torsion-bar suspension, stainless-steel body; one-piece frame, rear-mounted engine, aircraft type control column for steering and braking and no-glare, slotted headlights. Among his many patents was an engine which would run on any fuel. In 1933 he built Boston's first parking garage

Title: Re: Puzzle #154 - Solved! Eliot Cricket III
Post by: Rich on February 25, 2007, 09:07:01 AM
It might be of interest to you, Abingdon, that your post was reported as being offensive.  To the uninitiated, it would appear our brand of sarcastic wit is a bit boorish.  FWIW.....
Title: Re: Puzzle #154 - Solved! Eliot Cricket III
Post by: MG on February 25, 2007, 09:22:22 AM
Were does karn come up with this stuff

THAT is a question to which there is no known answer. Some suggest he has been reincarnated, having previously lived here on earth in the body of one Machiavelli!     :o

And as far as that other thing, rich, yeah, I know all about it and have humbly prostrated myself in front of the critquer, pulled my forelock and begged for foregiveness.

In my own unique style, of course!    ;D
Title: Re: Puzzle #154 - Solved! Eliot Cricket III
Post by: Rich on February 25, 2007, 09:30:06 AM
Well, Jeez...even I thought it was an Eliot Cricket III.....


:o ;)
Title: Re: Puzzle #154 - Solved! Eliot Cricket III
Post by: grobmotorix on December 30, 2015, 05:45:44 PM
Mr. Samuel Eliot himself said this vehicle is named "New Era Safety Car" in a 1939 British car magazine:

Title: Re: Puzzle #154 - Solved! Eliot Cricket III
Post by: Otto Puzzell on December 31, 2015, 04:44:09 AM
Perhaps as he fiddled with the car (1939 was a year later than its build) he gave it a more marketable name, as he was touting its safety. Somebody should tell the museum that owns and displays the car with the bogus name I quoted.  :(