OGB-55 Somac CU-500 Jeep Prototype Renault 4x4 1986 France

Started by Oguerrerob, April 19, 2018, 04:16:39 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Oguerrerob


oko94


Oguerrerob


Wendax


Oguerrerob


oko94


Oguerrerob

Cx-500 (Missing one letter)

oko94


Oguerrerob


oko94

Is the missing letter a vowel ?

Oguerrerob


oko94


Oguerrerob


oko94


Oguerrerob

No, There's no sense to wait 5 answers. if you're gonna get there anyway.  Let's solve it. It's CU-500

Somua (Société d'outillage mécanique et d'usinage d'artillerie) CU-500 Jeep Prototype Renault 4x4 1986 France

oko94

Thanks for my 897th point !

Could you please post the whole article as I still can't find the source ?

Oguerrerob

As soon as I find it, I'll post it or send you via pm

Wendax


Oguerrerob

#68
I've found another PDF from The Encyclopedia of military vehicles - Kochnev E.D. In russian
Apparently there's a confusion between SOMUA (Societe d'Outillage Mecanique et d'Usinage d'Artillerie) and SOMAC.

"France
1986-1989
In June 1986, a new army jeep was unveiled in France, almost identical to its prototype Willys of the Second World War. It was a prototype CU-500 (4x4) with a carrying capacity of 500 kg, built by SOMAK, a subsidiary of the company Renault (Renault), and based on the units produced by her cars. Unlike the Willys, he received a glass-plasgik body and an all-metal welded base, on which a diesel engine was mounted, a 5-speed gearbox, two-way axles with differential lock, a McPherson front suspension and front disc brakes Reno. " Acceptance tests the car did not pass, and the air transportable version created in 1989 remained a model prototype."


Anyway he explained the misunderstanding.
  I have to ask if I can post the link here?

Wendax

SOMAC makes much more sense than Somua, because SOMAC (Société de Montage Autos Camions) is the former 4x4 specialist Sinpar, and is called Renault Tech today. And the CU-500 probably just means Charge Utile (= payload) 500 kg.

Oguerrerob

Apparently my confusion came, because the translation. The original source, where I took the picture, was a extract of this book and said SOMUA, I couldn't check because it was wrong. I didn't save it and I was searching since the lack of credibility. I've found this new one and I double check and Somac is correct.
Sorry for the misinformation,  :bag:

oko94