News:

Brand new front page!  Click the Front Page button directly below and check it out!

Main Menu

Solved: Wendax 917 - Kühn 8/40 PS Typ K8

Started by Wendax, May 30, 2013, 02:18:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wendax

Three men not in a boat, but ?

For one point, please respond and identify this car.

Wendax


ropat53


Wendax

Not Stoewer and earlier

ropat53


Wendax


targhediferro


Wendax


targhediferro


Wendax


targhediferro


4popoid


Wendax


Wendax


4popoid

1929 NAG-Protos TYP 201 (12/60 PS)?  It could be a TYP 204 (14/70), with a bored out engine, and a longer body (same wheelbase).  From this picture angle I can't tell for sure, but I think this is the shorter bodied TYP 201.

Wendax

Sorry, not a NAG-Protos

4popoid

I haven't been able to locate a picture, but the verbiage, specs and dates sound about right, so how about: 1928/29 Certus 8/45 PS?

Wendax

Car size and time is about right, but it is not a Certus, sorry.

targhediferro

Kuhn 8/40 PS, 1928?

Wendax

Yes, it is a Kühn 8/40 PS from 1928/1929, also known as the Kühn K8. It was a luxurious version of the Opel 8/40 PS, built by the coachbuilder Kühn and marketed under his own name.

One more point for you. Five points left before reaching (the well-deserved) professional status.

ftg3plus4

Why does it look like there was badly-done cut-and-paste editing done on part of the picture ( around the front wheel & the sitting guy's pants)? Is there a copy of the photo available without this?
"May I submit 'Utopian Turtletop'? Do not trouble to answer unless you like it."
-- Marianne Moore, suggesting a name for what would become the Edsel

Wendax

There was an awful "watermark" by an ebay seller. I didn't save the watermarked picture.

ftg3plus4

Oh, OK. I guess you have to do what you have to do...
"May I submit 'Utopian Turtletop'? Do not trouble to answer unless you like it."
-- Marianne Moore, suggesting a name for what would become the Edsel

Wendax


Wendax

Quote from: ftg3plus4 on June 10, 2013, 09:00:14 AM
Oh, OK. I guess you have to do what you have to do...
The watermarked picture appeared again, so here it is: